beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.04.26 2016고정131

과실치상

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The defendant is a kind of guard dog in which the defendant has installed fences on the apartment house Masa in Kim Jong-si, and has feed once a week, and the defendant is a kind of Bacasian Ovtchara, as an origin, which has protected both detacheds from invasions.

Russia describe this part as a malicious, and it is necessary to pay attention to this part.

When it is actually changing from a dangerous situation, it is difficult to see htp information of the Association of the Republic of Korea (see / Terms and Conditions.naver.com/98913 & ; c. d.677 & c. 4677 & d. 46777). While c.i.e., a plant variety is being raised, the plant variety should not be cut off on April 25, 2015 or at around 17:00, or due to negligence, such as being placed in the territory of the Republic of Korea, which caused damage to the body of the victims (or 81) and the body of the victims (or the body of the victims) who were in the middle of the dry field in Kim Jong-si City, in order to kill the body of the victims (or the body of the victims).

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. A medical certificate;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each investigation report (exploiting an investigation report around the scene, attaching a record, holding a veterinarian's interview with the body of the victim's wife, attaching a photograph of damage);

1. Article 266 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. There is no evidence that the defendant's opening of the arguments was the victim.

2. In light of the following circumstances, which are duly admitted and duly examined by this court, the victim can be sufficiently recognized in light of the evidence duly admitted and examined:

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.