When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On January 17, 2015, at around 09:00, the Defendant damaged the damaged portion of the victim’s possession by gathering two chemical parts owned by the victim from the front glass of the entrance to the Ecafeteria of the operation of the victim D, which had been clicked with other customers, and by gathering two chemical parts owned by the victim into the front glass of the entrance. The heat winder was stored on the water purifier, and the chemical parts were stored on the water purifier so that the total amount of 3060,000 won of the repair cost can be seen as 30,000 won.

2. The Defendant interfered with the business by force, such as: (a) the Defendant collected a flower at the time and place specified in paragraph (1); (b) had customers drinking alcohol out of the said E-cafeteria, and continuously expressed a large voice for about one hour; and (c) prevented other customers from entering the said E-cafeteria; and (d) interfered with the victim’s operation of the restaurant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A photograph of the damaged site;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of causing damage to property and the choice of fines) of the relevant Act on criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.