On September 14, 2017, 2017, the Defendant: (a) stated that the victim E (S) who was suffering from exposure in the old urology as a different place from “D” located in C around 01:00 on September 14, 2017; (b) provided that the victim’s face was heard from the injured party; (c) he saw the victim’s face at one time with right drinking; (d) opened the victim’s face over the floor; and (e) took the victim’s face on both hand at one time, the victim was injured by the victim, such as a son’s decline, which requires approximately four weeks of treatment.

Around October 11, 2017, the Defendant became aware of the Victim G (V) at “F,” which is a Mannam website, and assaulted the Victim G (V and 18 years of age) at around that time, around October 16, 2017, around 16:50 on October 16, 2017, at the victim’s residence located in the Seoul Northern-gu H and OOOOOO, and the victim’s knife and knife the victim’s knife with knife with knife and knife knife knife knife knife.

On October 27, 2017, the Defendant suffered from the victim's J (60 years of age), K, L, etc. in the front way of "Atel of Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu Itel", and suffered from the victim's spatch fat, and suffered from the victim's face twice in e-mail, and suffered from the victim's injury, such as an internal fatum fat, which requires approximately three weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect to E or J;

1. Statement made by each police with respect to G or L;

1. On-site and on-the-spot photographs of violence, each injury diagnosis report, and each investigation report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquire about criminal history;

1. Article 257 (1) and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Although there are favorable circumstances for the defendant, such as the first sentence of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act for the punishment of concurrent crimes, and the fact that the defendant has reached an agreement with the injured party for the reason of sentencing, and that the defendant has a depth of his/her mistake, it is favorable to the defendant.