마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
The number of seized assistants No. 1, and the head of the Suwon District Prosecutors' Office.
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Power] On February 9, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on January 15, 2018, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Chuncheon Prison on March 15, 2018.
【Criminal Facts】
"2018 Highest 2605" accused is not a person handling narcotics.
Nevertheless, on November 17, 2018, from around 19:00 to around 12:00 the following day, the Defendant administered psychotropic drugs in a way that the Defendant injected the Defendant’s left arms by using a disposable injection device, a psychotropic drug, in the B apartment C, and a Melap c, a psychotropic drug, into the Defendant’s left arms.
"2019 Highest 847" accused is not a person handling narcotics.
On September 24, 2018, the Defendant: (a) delivered one of the disposable injection equipment, including approximately 0.02 grams of psychotropic drugs, to E, who was aware of his knowledge at the Defendant’s office located in the Hanam-si D apartment, from the Defendant’s office, and received philopon by delivering approximately 0.02 grams of psychotropic drugs (one philopon; hereinafter “philopon”).
Summary of Evidence
"2018 Highest 2605"
1. Each legal statement of the witness F, G, H, I, and J;
1. A report on investigation, and a report on requests for appraisal;
1. Ratifications, reports on requests for appraisal;
1. 12 Notification to the department related to the report of the case;
1. Criminal history records, investigation reports (the same kind of suspect's power and the fact of repeated crime), the defendant and his defense counsel did not administer phiphones, and the police officer's arrest without notifying the anti-son principles in a state that does not meet the requirements for arrest constitutes illegal arrest. Thus, the evidence obtained based on this constitutes illegally collected evidence.
However, according to the above macroscopic evidence, around November 18, 2018, the defendant's mother discovered scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopics of the defendant and the defendant's scopic scopic scopic scopics of the defendant.