2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff is a company that runs the business of constructing housing, and the Defendant is a broadcasting business entity that reports the comprehensive news, etc.

B. On May 4, 1983, the news report Nos. 1) B and C purchased a house for 59.17m2 and sap assessment (hereinafter “instant house”) on May 4, 1983, Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D ground brick and sap assessment, and acquired the ownership thereof. C, the representative director of the Plaintiff, is the owner of the instant E forest and field No. 80m2 (hereinafter “instant land”).

B) Some of the instant housing owned by B was built on the part of the instant land owned by C. However, C filed a lawsuit against B to the Seoul Southern District Court to the effect that B remove the affected part of the instant land and deliver the affected part of the said land. On December 24, 1999, C obtained winning judgment (the above court 99Da31869) (C). The said judgment was finalized on January 13, 2000, and C removed the affected part of the instant housing (hereinafter referred to as “the instant housing”) and paid KRW 38 million to C as damages for the unauthorized occupation of part of the instant land.

2) After the removal of a part of the instant land, B, as seen above, installed the entrance door (hereinafter “instant entrance”) and the window (hereinafter “instant window”) on the east (the instant land direction) of the instant house (hereinafter “instant window”) (where the entrance of the instant case is opened, part of the instant land was the structure that part of the instant building was invaded), and part of the instant land was committed by installing a smoke mine and water measuring instruments boom, etc. (hereinafter “facilities of the instant case”).

B. On March 13, 2012, the Plaintiff owned C, adjacent to the East side of the instant land, Guro-gu Seoul.