If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Although the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the price even if he received an alcoholic beverage and an alcoholic beverage, the Defendant, as if he were to pay the price to the victim E (the 53 years old) who is a business owner within the 6-studio of the “D” entertainment tavern 01:00 Gangnam-si, Gangnam-si, the Defendant acquired the pecuniary benefit of the equivalent amount because he did not pay the price to the victim E (the 53 years old).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Receipts:

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.