However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On October 23, 2012, the Defendant: (a) driven a fluor cargo vehicle with a blood alcohol content of 0.152% under the influence of alcohol content 0.152% from the Do in front of 226-1 in the case of bankruptcy at the time of the bankruptcy; (b) on October 23, 2012, from the Do in front of 226-1 in the case of the bankruptcy; and (c) from the Do in front of 26-1 in the case of the bankruptcy at the time of the bankruptcy; and

2. On October 23, 2012, around 23:30 on October 23, 2012, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the performance of official duties; (b) at the office of the Dog-Saeng-Saeng-Saeng-Saeng-Saeng-Saeng-Saeng-Saeng-Saeng-Saeng-Saeng-Saeng-Seng-Saeng-Saeng-Saeng-Seng-Saeng-Saeng-Seng-Saeng-Seng-Sang-Seng-Sang-Sang-Sang-Seng-Sang-Seng-Sang-Seng-Sang-Sang-gu, the Defendant: (c) when the Defendant controlled the victim’s brea-kin operation, as in the preceding paragraph, she exercised violence, such as the victim’s wheels.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning criminal investigations, and at the same time, the victim E was faced with the left-hand spons in need of two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Each statement of E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report and notification of the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 148-2 (2) 2 of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime (the point of drinking and driving);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is that the defendant has driven a drinking on an expressway in the condition of detention, and that the crackdown police officer.