2. The Defendant repeatedly committed the crime of the same law as the previous one during the period of repeated crime due to the same crime.

In particular, even before each of the crimes of this case, even before the crime of this case was committed, the same criminal act of the same law was committed during the period of repeated crime and was sentenced to a fine, and the crime of this case was committed again on three days thereafter.

Until the trial of the case, the victims were unable to reach an agreement or to recover the damage.

In full view of the defendant's age, environment, health and financial standing, and all other sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments in this case, the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant is deemed appropriate and is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.