2. The lower court determined the sentence by comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances and the matters stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act. A person under way: Cumulative accumulation of criminal records of the same kind, persons who have been mitigated, such as recidivism during the period of the same repeated crime: confessions and important cooperation in investigation, etc., and the reason why the Defendant was in the course of sentencing alleged in the trial is that the lower court had already taken into account the factors that the lower court had already determined the punishment and did not seem to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

In addition, there are no circumstances to determine that the conditions of sentencing were changed in the trial, so it is reasonable to respect the sentencing of the court below.

Therefore, we cannot accept the defendant's argument during the sentencing.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.