A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months, and for six months, each of the defendants C shall be punished.

but for three years from the date this judgment becomes final.

Defendant

A A is a shipbuilding of the nationality of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as "China") that entered the Republic of Korea with a visa for a short-term comprehensive (C-3) visa around August 4, 2006, and Defendant C is a Chinese national shipbuilding of the present visit employment (H-2) visa after entering the Republic of Korea around February 1, 200, and is the mother of Defendant A.

Defendant

C around April 2006 through July 7, 2006, upon the request of C to C of the acquisition of nationality, which was known to China, “A request to find out the way of entry into the Republic of Korea,” and D of the Defendant’s consent that “A would have a citizen of the Republic of Korea acquire the nationality of the Republic of Korea in disguised manner with his family member of the Republic of Korea.”

Defendant

A around that time, he taken a family photograph on July 5, 2005, as the children of acquiring the nationality of the Republic of Korea and the remaining births of Kim-U.S., who were born in the Republic of Korea by Defendant A, even though he did not have any relationship with D, Kim-U.S. with D, Kim-U.A.

On the other hand, at the same time, D arbitrarily created a certificate of pro-friendly relationship in the name of the Chinese black, Syunwon E and a resident population registration table, respectively, with the false content that Defendant A's children and Kim Smi is his father's father's father's father in the French French area.

On September 21, 2006, Defendant A, along with D, submitted the aforementioned false documents at the former Immigration Office of the Jeonjin-gu, Seoul, and applied for special naturalization at the former Immigration Office of the Republic of Korea, which continued to fall after the written test.

1. The Defendants related to the application for permission of naturalization were able to again file an application for permission of naturalization according to D’s instructions, who fell off in the written examination for continuous permission of naturalization.

Defendant

A photographed D and family photographs around July 2009, and D at around that time, they made at will a copy of the certificate of pro-friendly relationship in the name of the Chinese black, Syll, Syll, Syll, Syll, and Syll, Syll, Syll, Syll, Syll, Syll, Syll,

Defendant A continues to be accompanied by D on 207.