A. The Defendant B and D posted, on the H’s account, a photograph, shot, shot, and a photograph of a police and a ditch, etc., of the Plaintiff’s interviewed with the content of “J” in the name of “I,” and Defendant B and D written and posted the comments as follows.

Defendant B H 16:41 The police arrested in Defendant D H 13:57 for the year after the swine wave is more likely to do so. B.

Defendant E and F posted a picture, picture, etc., which the Plaintiff had an interviewed with the content of “M” on the L’s account by a Face North Korean user using the conversation called “K,” and written and posted the comments as follows.

일시 댓글 내용 피고 E G 00:39 ㅋㅋㅋ 메친년ㅋㅋㅋ 메갈돈육녀 등극 피고 F G 00:01 엠창개좆같이생�네

C. The Plaintiff filed a complaint against the Defendants with an investigative agency on suspicion of insult; Defendant B and E received a disposition of suspension of indictment; Defendant F received a summary order of KRW 200,000,000; Defendant D received a disposition of rejection of the complaint on the ground that “ even if the content of the comments is not an abstract judgment or a destructive sentiment that may undermine the people’s social evaluation in the crime of insult, it is difficult to view the content of the comments as an expression of an abstract judgment or a destructive sentiment; and even if some of the complainants expressed their opinions or opinions that could cause displeasure, such expression does not contravene the social norms in light of sound social norms, and thus, it is evident that the content of the comments constitutes a crime or a crime.”

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 4, 6, 8, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings and arguments

2. According to the above facts of recognition as to the claims against Defendant B, E, and F, the Defendants drafted and posted comments, including ambiguous expressions against the Plaintiff or lineal ascendants and descendants against the Plaintiff.