2. The judgment of the court below is deemed to have caused the Defendant to commit the instant crime, even though it appears that the Defendant had a defect in the examination of the Defendant’s living female while drinking, and that the Defendant led to the instant crime, and that the Defendant led to the Defendant’s confession of the instant crime and reflects his mistake, it seems to have already been considered in the sentencing of the court below.

In addition, the crime of this case was committed by the defendant when taking advantage of the victim's face and clothes, resulting in bodily injury, such as unfashion that requires the victim's treatment for three weeks, and the liability for the crime was not provided against the defendant, and the defendant has been sentenced to criminal punishment at least 20 times for the same crime. In particular, the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for 10 months or suspended execution for assault, etc. at Suwon District Court on March 15, 2017, which was sentenced by the court below on March 23, 2017, which was decided on March 23, 2017, and was committed again for the same crime of this case on several occasions without being aware of the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of it during the suspended execution period, and there is no trace of the defendant's efforts to recover damage, and considering various conditions in the sentencing of this case including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, motive and circumstance of the crime, and the result after the crime, it is unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is not accepted.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.