2. In full view of the following facts: (a) selling food without indicating the name of the processing establishment as stated in the instant crime; (b) undermining sound order in the distribution of food; (c) undermining consumers’ right to know; and (d) undermining the quality of the relevant crime; and (c) having been punished for similar crimes (mark of origin); and (d) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family environment; (b) details of the instant crime; and (c) the conditions of sentencing as indicated in the instant pleadings, including the circumstances before and after the instant crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment

3. According to the conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.