beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 2013.7.3.선고 2013고단778 판결

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단·홈기등상해)

Cases

2013 Highest 778 Violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (injury by collective, home, etc.)

Defendant

00

Residence

Reference domicile

Prosecutor

Freeboard (prosecution), Glaverb (Trial)

Defense Counsel

Attorney Park Do-young

Imposition of Judgment

July 3, 2013

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The Defendant was a person who resides in 00 multi-household 102 in Cheongju-si, and the death of 103 in the same house was living together with Do governor Do governor △△△, but he was able to mislead the Defendant that the noise, which was flicked in the above Do governor Do governor-gu residential area

On May 7, 2013, around 23:20 on May 23:20, 2013, the Defendant cited the improvement, which is a deadly weapon, and inflicted injury on the victim, such as an open wound, which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment, on the part of the victim, after she went out of the victim exclusive dedicated (0,00 years of age), she went into the place where she reported the Defendant, and she entered she in the place where she reported the Defendant. At this time, she should not be seen as having been changed from the victim. The Defendant got back to the she and went into dispute by hearing the horse of her, which is necessary to give approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement on the Dormant, Do Governor, Do Governor;

1. A medical certificate of injury, and each photograph;

Application of Statutes

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

Articles 3(1) and 2(1)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Discretionary mitigation;

Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act

Reasons for sentencing

The punishment as ordered shall be determined in consideration of all the factors of sentencing, such as the fact that the defendant is led to the crime, the fact that the defendant deposited 3 million won for the victim, the fact that there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, and the fact that the defendant has committed the crime of this case with a deadly weapon. As a result, the crime of this case has been committed in the forepart of the victim's left-hand part, such as the fact that the crime of this case and the contents of damage have not been light, and that there is no agreement with the victim, and other unfavorable circumstances such as the fact that there is no agreement with the victim, and other factors of sentencing, such as the age, character

Judges

Maduk Jina