beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2020.02.06 2018고합69

특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(배임)

Text

Defendants are not guilty.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. In fact, from October 1, 2002 to December 13, 2012, Defendant A engaged in C’s strategic tasks as the president (CSO, Whitey Offer, and highest strategic officer) and took overall control of the group’s core strategic tasks, acquisition, merger, and sale of affiliate companies, purchase and sale of major assets, and decision-making of major investments, etc., Defendant A was in a position to exercise overall control over the management of each affiliate company as its officers, including Co., Ltd. D (hereinafter “D”), E Co. (hereinafter “E”), and F (hereinafter “F”).

Defendant

B From April 1, 2003 to February 1, 2009, from March 1, 2009 to February 2, 2009, the management planning director in charge of strategy planning, personnel affairs, and re-elections, and from March 1, 2009 to January 201, the management planning director in charge of the management planning director in charge of E’s strategic planning, personnel affairs, and re-elections, he takes charge of E’s accounting, fund execution, etc. while working as the re-general, etc., while managing the funds created with Defendant A and the so-called “office” managing the personal property of Defendant A, and Defendant A exercises a strong influence on the personnel affairs, accounting, etc. of the executives and employees of each affiliate company, beyond the status of the head of each E, and was in the position to the extent that each of the representative directors of each affiliate company did not understand the horses delivered by Defendant B as the meaning of Defendant A’s objection.

E is an affiliated company of C established for the purpose of sports promotion betting business on August 15, 2016, and the corporation dissolved with G (former D) and the corporation dissolved. H (former I; hereinafter “H”) is a corporation established for the purpose of golf, skiing and comprehensive leisure industry, and is the J J’s subsidiary, the subsidiary of E, and the sub-subsidiary of E, and K is a person who conducted real estate implementation business upon the recommendation of Defendant A.

Defendant

A The recruitment of occupants is completed on September 2006.