마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor, three years of suspended execution, two years of probation, 80 hours of community service, etc.) of the lower court is too unreasonable;
2. In full view of the following circumstances, the lower court’s sentence against the Defendant is deemed appropriate in light of all of the following factors: the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family relations, the frequency and amount of handling philophones, and all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the records and arguments, such as the circumstances after the crime.
Defendant’s assertion is without merit.
The favorable circumstances: The fact that the administration of philophones is not limited to the crime such as the administration of philophones and the arrangement of the sale of philophones, the fact that the crime is against the crime, and the fact that there is no criminal force for more than 10 years since the punishment was imposed for the same kind of crime in 2001: Narcotics-related crimes require strict measures; the fact that there is a need for strict response; the reaction of training philophones was confirmed from the whole Malophones, and that thorough supervision is necessary for the future will and supervision thereof.
3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is groundless.