A. With respect to the land (hereinafter “the instant farmland” for convenience) released from the disposition No. 1 (hereinafter “the instant farmland”), the fact that the Defendant (appointed parties; hereinafter “Defendant”) and the mother of the remaining designated parties died on or around July 1987, and that the Defendant and the remaining designated parties jointly inherited the network D’s property in equal shares. There is no dispute between the parties, and the purport of the entire pleadings is added to the Plaintiff’s first instance-friendly E’s possession of the instant farmland from around 1979 to the date of the commencement of the possession of the instant farmland. Thus, barring any special circumstance, the Defendant and the remaining designated parties have the obligation to file for the Plaintiff’s transfer registration from the date of commencement of the acquisition of ownership to the date of succession of E’s possession of the instant farmland from around 201 to the date of the acquisition of the instant farmland from around 1/4 of each of the instant farmland, and thus, the Plaintiff and the remaining designated parties have the obligation to file for the transfer registration of ownership from the date of commencement of ownership.

B. As to this, the defendant argued that the possession of the plaintiff on the part of the plaintiff on the farmland of this case constitutes the so-called "the possession of other owner", but there is no evidence to recognize that fact, the above argument that the defendant's possession of the farmland of this case is not acceptable

2. According to the conclusion, the Plaintiff’s claim for the performance of each of the above obligations is accepted as it is, the Plaintiff’s claim for the performance of each of the instant claims.