However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who operates a “C company” in Incheon City B, and the victim D is a “F company” in Incheon City E, and the victim G is a person who operates I in Incheon City H.

피고인은 자신이 다른 형사재판으로 인하여 위 회사 운영에 제대로 신경을 쓰지 못하는 사이에 피해자 G가 자신의 거래처를 가로챘다고 생각하던 중 피해자들이 중앙선 J 현장에 공급원 승인을 받지 않은 골재를 납품하였다는 사실을 알게 되자 그러한 사실을 비롯하여 피해자들에 대한 좋지 않은 소문을 퍼뜨리기로 마음먹었다.

1. The Defendant’s defamation from the end of May 2017 to the same year.

6. In the field office of L 1 Section K located in Chungcheongnamyang-gun, Chungcheongnamyang-gun, the fact was that the victim did not take a heavy interest in the course of supply of aggregate, and that the victim did not drive away without obtaining retirement allowances from female employees, and the head of the field management division of the Section 1 section 1 section 1 section 2 stated that “D supplied inferior aggregate not approved by the source of supply to J 2 section M and carried out a heavy interest. The vice chief of the Section 1 section 1 section 2 stating that “nick female employees were detained in narrow embankments and detained by threatening to be in embezzlement with public funds, thereby passing away without paying retirement allowances.” From around that time to July 5, 2017, the lower court spread false facts against the victim seven times in total, such as the list 1 of the crimes committed in the annexed Table 1.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

2. No person who violates the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection (Defamation) shall distribute information with a content that defames other persons by divulging false information openly to the public through information and communications networks;

A. On July 4, 2017, the Defendant committed a crime against the victim D with an intent to slander the victim D, who is a person engaged in the same industry, at the expense of the victim. The fact is the victim.