2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff’s invention of this case (A evidence 3, B No. 6) 1: The name of the invention of this case: the system and method for combining 3D text content with 3D content: the filing date/application number: the claim(s) No. 13/10 / 10-2012-7021233, Jan. 13, 2010 / the claim(s) 1 / 3D image(s) - As a result, image can be displayed by 3D display display - at least one of the above 3D images, including one 3D image, and at least one of the above 3D text contents related to one 3D images, and at least one of the above 13D images, including an interview component(s) 1 - 1 - 2 interview(s).

(i) at least one 3D image at the time when the vehicle was extracted from the present frame is expressed as parallax or sea, and is expressed as parallax or sea. At least one 3D image is determined on the basis of the combination of the following information extracted from the foregoing information and at least one 3D image (hereinafter referred to as “class 2”).

(i) at least one of the above 3D images inserting the above 3D images at the location of the desire in the 1 interview above and select the above 3D images at the 1 interview above; and include the steps to determine the location of the above 3D images at the 2 interview above, and the location in the 2 interview above shall include the steps to determine the location of the 3D image at least, on the 1 interview of the response 3D image as specified above, at least on the 3D image at least on the 1st interview (hereinafter referred to as the “class 3”).

) The method (hereinafter referred to as “instant Claim 1 invention”) (hereinafter referred to as “instant Claim 2”). In paragraph 1 of Article 2 of the Claim 2, paragraph 1 of the same Article, the following step is to listen to the cross-bating limitation in order to identify the aforementioned 3D image content.