준강제추행
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (fact-finding) was that the victim was sealed by a motor vehicle string, and the victim was seated next to the victim in order to prevent the victim from facing his/her head, and there was no indecent act committed by the victim as stated in the facts of the crime in the judgment.
2. The court below argues that the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, i.e., ① the victim stated to the effect that "the defendant has come to the right chest of his own left chest, clearly going to the right side" as stated in the criminal facts consistently in the investigation agency and court of the court below, ② the victim immediately after the crime of this case stated that he was committed an indecent act against the taxi engineer by getting on and off the taxi, ③ the defendant attempted to get off the bus stop and let off the bus, ③ the defendant found that he was able to get off the bus stop, and that "the victim was able to get off the bus stop, and so he was able to get off the bus stop, so he was able to get off the bus stop at the time of the last time of the police bus driving, and the victim's statement to the effect that the victim had not been able to get off the bus driver at the time of the police bus education and the fact that he had not been able to get off the bus driver at the time of the time of the victim's statement."