상해치사
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for five years.
Seized evidence No. 1 shall be forfeited from the defendant.
Punishment of the crime
Around July 2016, the Defendant married with the Victim B (36). Around July 2016, there was a conflict between husband and wife due to the problem that the victimized party does not communicate with the company fees by drinking. Around November 2017, the Defendant changed the password of the entrance and exit and caused a more serious conflict between husband and wife.
On November 22, 2017, at around 17:45, the Defendant: (a) reported that the victim, in the conversation between the Defendant’s father E, and the Defendant’s husband, had the Defendant talked about the Defendant’s father, and had the Defendant talked about it without any brucation; (b) deducted the knife from the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Legal statement of the witness H;
1. A report on occurrence and a report on verification;
1. A list of seizure records (voluntary submission), and a list of seizure;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to medical certificates of death, reports on results of investigation of changed persons, certificates of medical records, and certificates of autopsy appraisal;
1. Article 259 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;
1. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the judgment on the causal relationship between the defendant's act and the victim's death under Article 48 (1) 1 of the Confiscation Criminal Code, the defendant suffered a light of about 3 cm in length of the victim's ear on the road, and the victim died of excessive blood due to damage to the knife and spine blood transfusion.
Therefore, the defendant's act was the direct cause of death of the victim.
The decision is judged.
As the defendant asserts, the victim's surgery was delayed;
Even before the operation.