except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 12, 2018, at around 23:15, the Defendant: (a) received a demand from the staff of the police box of the Yangsan Police Station D that the Defendant did not pay the drinking value at the C cafeteria located in Yangsan City B, to present his identification card; (b) stated that “n’t the identification card or the first pit as soon as possible,” and (c) stated that the Defendant was the mother of the E head.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on handling 112 reported duties due to violence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Application of the statutes governing photographs at the time of crime;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. Determination in consideration of the reasons for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] of the Suspension of Execution of Official Duties, including the fact that there is no basic area (6 to 1 year and 6 months), including the same kind of punishment [decision of sentence] (decision of sentence], the degree of violence and interference with official duties, and the fact that there is no emphasis on the degree of violence and interference with official duties, etc.