2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff is a student who was enrolled in the National University Law School, a National University.

B. On February 23, 2016, the faculty conference of the B University: (a) the Plaintiff’s following:

C. A decision was made on the expulsion of the Plaintiff under Article 99(2) of the Regulations on the Punishment of Students at B University by deeming that such an act falls under Article 15 subparag. 5, 6, 9, 13, 15, and 16 of the said Regulations.

C. After obtaining approval from the president of B University on March 7, 2016, the president of B University and the president of B University issued a proposal against the Plaintiff on March 11, 2016 pursuant to Article 99 of the Regulations on the Regulations of B University due to the following disciplinary reasons:

(hereinafter referred to as “instant Disposition.” - The Plaintiff sent plagiarism to the Plaintiff from January 5, 2015 to November 2, 2015 1) - The academic background (or doctorate in Buceo) of professor C at the Law School of B and the Law School of C and the Law School of 2008 . (2) the research performance of C professors published around 2008 . (3) C professor’s research papers or translations (hereinafter referred to as “D”, “E”, “F”, “H”, and “I”) were plagiarism or C professor sent 1.0 to the Plaintiff’s own performance, and 4) the Plaintiff sent - from 2015 to 2015 / K law school, - The Plaintiff sent 1.0 on the Internet law school, - The date on which the professor did not have access to professors, such as teaching lessons, and 1.5 on the Internet or 1.0 on the Internet.