2. The fact that the Defendant, who judged the grounds for appeal, reflects his mistake, does not repeat again, and that the degree of injury that occurred from the instant traffic accident is not relatively more severe, and that the Defendant is the primary offender is favorable to the Defendant.

On the other hand, the occurrence of a traffic accident while driving without the license of this case is becoming realistic, and the defendant's distance from driving without the license of this case is relatively long, and it is disadvantageous to the defendant that the defendant did not agree with or recover from the damage.

In addition, in full view of the Defendant’s age, character, conduct and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and all of the sentencing factors indicated in the instant records and pleadings, such as the circumstances after the crime was committed, the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.