All applications for the instant compensation order shall be dismissed.

The facts charged of this case.

【Criminal Power】 On July 1, 2004, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Western District Court, and the remaining term of imprisonment was expired on August 12, 2005 during the execution of the sentence.

【Criminal Facts of Crimes】 The Defendant, who did not intend to be sexually sexually, committed as if he had graduated from H in the U.S. even though he did not intend to be sexually sexually, did so with the victim F, and had the intent to receive money by pretending that he would be married with the victim, and had Korean people abroad engage in the act as if they were experts in the field of financial investment, and had them receive money under the pretext of the cost of establishing the corporation, etc.

1. On January 2007, the Defendant’s fraud against the Victim F, on the ground of the following: (a) the victim F entered into an auction with the victim F on the following false statement: (b) “A mother operating a private hospital in front of the Incheon Bupyeong-gu, with his/her mother’s sexual surgery from the H University located in the United States, with his/her mother’s sexual surgery and intention; (c) on the premise of marriage, he/she entered into an auction with the victim F on the ground that he/she was unable to be well aware of the fact that he/she was operating the original plant in Vietnam, operated the original plant in Vietnam, operated the original plant in Vietnam, and lent 1.8 billion won to his/her friendship; and (d) later, he/she entered into an auction with the victim F on the ground that he/she was defective

8. Around 16.16. The victim stated that “I will pay back one month after the purchase and sale of the inventory source if I lend money that requires two million won to the victim.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not intend to pay money from the victim, but did not have any intent or ability to pay money, even if he borrowed money from the victim.

In the end, the defendant deceivings the victim as above, and is the mother of the defendant I. 2 million won under the pretext of the cost of purchasing the original group on the same day from the victim.