A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,00 and by a fine of KRW 3,00,000, respectively.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Defendant

A is a person who operates the “E Inn’s accommodation” in Gangnam-si D, and Defendant B is a person who operates the “G inn’s accommodation” in F.

No person shall arrange, solicit, induce or compel sexual traffic.

Nevertheless, around February 25, 2016, Defendant B instructed the police officer who wanted to engage in sexual traffic on the roads of “G inn's house” as “En's accommodation” operated by Defendant A, and then contacted the women in sexual traffic with H, thereby allowing the said “En's accommodation” to engage in sexual traffic. Defendant A instructed the police officer under the control to “En's accommodation” 101, and had the said H enter the guest room.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to act as a broker for sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. A H statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (case concerning on-site situations);

1. Relevant Article 19 (1) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., concerning facts constituting an offense, and selection of fines under Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of each of the Criminal Procedure Act reflects the crime, and the gains acquired are insignificant, and Defendant B commits the crime of this case during the period of suspension of business by engaging in the act of arranging sexual traffic around January 2016, the punishment shall be determined as ordered in light of the fact that the Defendants committed the crime.