However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

around 19:00 on June 10, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was found to have a defect in arresting the Defendant as an act of assault in the course of assault; (b) on the part of the police officer affiliated with the D District, who was called up after having received a report of assault in Busan Dongdong-gu C; and (c) the Defendant resisted to the police officer,

Nices brought up in the same kind of bling, "boomed," and assaulted the chest of the above patrolman E in both hands and booming the boom.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted police officers to interfere with legitimate execution of official duties related to the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., reflection of the depth of the crime, and the fact that there is no record of the same kind of crime) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution [Scope of the punishment recommended] There is no person who has no basic area (i.e., six months to one year and four months) (i.e., interference with the performance of official duties and coercion of duties) (i., a person who is subject to special sentencing] [decision of sentence] 6 months of imprisonment