However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On July 24, 2016, the Defendant: (a) during the search of the Internet by the PC room located in the Gyeonggi-gu Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-do, Gyeonggi-do, DPC on July 14, 2016, the Defendant would offer KRW 500,000,000 to the Defendant’s account by withdrawing KRW 10,000,000,000, which is deposited to the Defendant’s account, from a person in unsound name.

“I hear the horses to the purport, and notify the accused of the Saemaul Treasury account (E) and password in the name of the accused.

On July 15, 2016, 11:47, at a non-permanent location, the victim F is called "KB National Bank G agency."

There is a national happy credit loan product, and it is expected to open a Muss passbook up to 3.9% per annum and maximum of 30 million won per annum with the preferential interest rate for employees.

It is impossible to open a Maspbook because there is no transaction performance, so it is possible to open a Maspbook because lending KRW 10 million to another lending company and immediately repay it.

“Along on July 25, 2016, the Defendant acquired money of KRW 10 million from the Defendant’s name to the (E) account of the Saemaul Treasury in the name of the Defendant and acquired it by fraud.

After that, on July 25, 2016, the Defendant, even though he was aware that the order of the wounded was illegal, withdrawn KRW 6.7 million from the Saemaul Treasury, which was located in the Dong-dong, Gyeonggi-gu, Gyeonggi-do, and took care of the wounded’s employees by facilitating the morale of the wounded.

2. On July 25, 2016, the Defendant violated the Electronic Financial Transactions Act (hereinafter referred to as the “Electronic Financial Transactions Act”) transferred a passbook and a check card, which is linked to the accounts of the Saemaul Treasury (E) in the name of the Defendant, to receive KRW 1 million on the roads front of the Saemaul Treasury in the Dong-gu, Gyeonggi-gu, Gyeonggi-do.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to F with respect to the preparation of the explanatory note;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the confirmation of deposit and bank reply data;

1. Article 49 of the Act on the Private Sector and Article 49 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act concerning facts constituting an offense;