A. The punishment sentenced by the lower court (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case is committed by taking into account the following circumstances: (a) the crime of this case is committed repeatedly under the circumstances: (b) the offender abused the victim’s trust in transactions on the Internet and repeatedly committed the crime; (c) the victim is a majority; (d) the victim is 6 million won; and (e) the victim does not actively endeavor to recover the victims’ damage; (d) the Defendant is led to confession and reflect; (e) the Defendant’s age is the victim’s age; and (e) the Defendant does not have any criminal record above the suspension of execution; and (e) the Defendant has taken into account various sentencing conditions provided for in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the character, conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and (e) the circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is adequate and too harsh or unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, since each appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.