If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

At around 00:05 on January 15, 2017, the Defendant: (a) received a report from a police officer C belonging to the Seo-gu Police Station of Incheon Seo-gu, which called “the Defendant was assaulted by the Defendant,” and received a report from the her husband, and asked the Defendant to open a door; (b) opened a door, and (c) opened a door, and (d) took one time near the right public play of the above C at the port hand.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to 112 reporting management.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Based on the grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the sentencing conditions specified in the trial process of the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, family relation, family relationship, home environment, motive and means of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, the sentence is determined as ordered.

A favorable condition: The defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case and reflects his mistake.

Unfavorable circumstances: The defendant has previously been punished by imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment.

It is necessary to severely punish police officers in order to enhance national confidence in the conduct of public duties.