2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On September 5, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a claim 1, 4, or 7 (hereinafter referred to as “ Claim 1 of the instant patent invention”) with the Intellectual Property Tribunal against the Defendant who is the patentee, and the remainder of the claims is identical to that of the instant patent invention pursuant to Articles 1 through 3 of the Prior Invention 1 through 3 (hereinafter referred to as “ordinary technician”).

(2) On May 26, 2015, the first and fifth inventions of this case are subject to non-obviousness by prior inventions 1 through 3. However, the fourth, six, and seven inventions of this case were partly cited in the Plaintiff’s petition for a trial for invalidation of registration on the grounds that the non-obviousness is not denied by prior inventions 1 through 3, and the remaining parts were dismissed.

B. The name of the invention of this case (Evidence 2) 1 of the defendant: C2 of the filing date/registration number: D/E/patent B 3 of the patented invention of this case. The outline of the patented invention of this case of this case is related to a fluorous movement. The purpose of the patented invention of this case is to provide a fluorous movement that improves the fixedness in the body of the wall so that the fluor can be easily installed by fixing the body to the wall in an erosion, without damage to the wall. The purpose is to provide a fluor number (00), / [1] / If the body body of the front body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the fluor 3 of the patented invention of this case is to ensure that the body of the body of the body of the body of the fluor 2 of the patented invention of this case can be used simply by inserting the body, without damage to the body of the body of the body.