대여금 등
1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.
2. The plaintiff's main claim is dismissed.
3. The plaintiff as added at the trial.
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff, an employee of D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”), invested KRW 20 million around July 201, and KRW 20 million around September 201, in D’s franchise operation business.
B. After that, the Plaintiff had concerns over losses of the principal of the investment requested the Defendant to return the investment amount, and the Defendant confirmed on January 31, 2012 that the Plaintiff was subject to refund of 20 million won (20,000,000 won) invested in D. On January 31, 2012: A resident registration number: E address: Si address in Ulsan-si: G address: G: the Plaintiff presented the paper prepared in advance to the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff was a private person or a seal is affixed. However, the Plaintiff, until receiving KRW 20,000,00,000,000, is not a private person, or cannot be stamped, and instead, the Defendant demanded that the Defendant take the responsibility for the said contents as above. The Defendant demanded that the Plaintiff return KRW 20,000 (20,000,000,000,0000,000,0000,000) to the Defendant.
3) The Plaintiff prepared and delivered the Plaintiff with the Plaintiff (based on the recognition), Gap evidence 1 (in the absence of any dispute, a certificate of refund, a certificate of refund of the first instance court and the first instance court's written appraisal of the written appraisal of the parties, and the entry of not more than nine items is recognized as the Defendant's pen, and thus, the authenticity is presumed to have been established), Gap evidence 2 (in the absence of the defendant's pen book by the result of the written appraisal of the first instance court and the first instance court's written appraisal of the party's written appraisal, the authenticity is presumed to have
2. Determination
A. On November 27, 201, the Plaintiff asserted a judgment as to the primary claim, and leased KRW 40 million to the Defendant. On March 6, 2012, the Defendant leased KRW 40 million to the Plaintiff.