On September 11, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Western District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on September 19, 2014.

1. On July 17, 2012, the Defendant forged a promissory note in the name of E with a seal imprint affixed on the E’s name attached to the E, after entering “E” and “E” in the Note column, using a color pen tool, without authority, for the purpose of exercising at D’s house located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, for the purpose of exercising the right at D’s house. The Defendant forged one copy of the promissory note in the name of E with a seal imprint affixed on the E’s name.

2. On July 17, 2012, the Defendant entered false information in the original copy of the process deed filed an application for registration of the establishment of the right to collateral security with the maximum amount of the claim No. 3472 of the G Building No. 3 E, Jung-gu, Seoul, Seoul, for the establishment of the right to collateral security on the said real estate, and had a public official in charge of being aware of the fact set up the right to collateral security on the said real estate by submitting for registration of the right to collateral security with the certificate of personal seal impression No. 3472 of the E, Jung-gu, Seoul, Seoul, and the debtor E and the neighboring mortgagee H.

In this respect, the defendant made a false report to the public official, and made him enter false facts in the certificate, which is the original copy of the fair deed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by each prosecutor to the prosecution with regard to D and I;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Each judgment, a copy of promissory note, each certificate of seal impression, a certified copy of register, and a contract for creation of collateral security;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: A reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, and application of each written judgment;

1. Relevant Article 214(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 214(1) of the Criminal Act (the fact of Article 214 of the Criminal Act as to the crime) and Article 228(1) of the Criminal Act (the fact of false entry of the original deed of process and the selection of imprisonment);

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The latter part of Article 39(1) of the Criminal Act exempted from punishment (the victim has already filed a complaint in the form of fraud);