If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On December 25, 2012, at around 22:40, the Defendant assaulted the victims of the defect that he wanted to arrest the victim E-gu Seoul Central Police Station E-gu, Seoul Central Police Station E-gu, and the victim slope G, who was dispatched to the scene after receiving a report of the assault, as a flagrant offender in the crime of injury, at the time of the Defendant’s desire to arrest the victim as a flagrant offender, the Defendant: (a) breath of the victim F’s breath and arms; (b) breath of the victim’s breathum by force; (c) breath of the victim’s breathum by force; and (d) breath of the victim’s flathy of the victim’s f

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a flagrant offender by a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against the defendant and H;

1. Application of each Act and subordinate statute to the police statement of G, F, and I;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;