Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 30 days shall be applied.

On April 10, 2017, around 17:15, the Defendant made a mistake that he was taking the meals in the 29th dong-dong of Busan Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan City 29 U.S., the Busan Gangseo-gu, Busan, and that he was the victim C ( South, 54 years old). However, the Defendant resisted the victim that the appraisal was borrowed prior to the upper limit of damage, and caused the defect of the horses to be exempted from the visibility that he borrowed prior to the upper limit of damage, and caused the victim's loss at one time.

Accordingly, the defendant tried to examine the victim's face face with which the number of days of treatment can not be known.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to C, D, and E;

1. A register of medical records of prisoners;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing evidence photographs;

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which had a history of criminal punishment for violent crimes in the past, committed the instant crime without being aware of the fact that the Defendant was serving a prison life upon the sentence of imprisonment, even though he was serving a prison term.

However, the degree of tangible force exercised by the defendant or the injury suffered by the victim is minor, and the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant.

The Defendant was subject to disciplinary action in prison due to the instant crime.

In light of the favorable circumstances in this point, the reasons for all the sentencing indicated in the arguments and records of this case shall be comprehensively considered, and the punishment shall be determined as per the order.