beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.02.19 2014고단398

도로법위반

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged of this case is as follows: "An employee of the defendant shall conduct the business of the defendant on June 30, 1998 on the roads front of the Youngcheon Business Office and the same year.

7. 24. Violation the restriction on the operation of vehicles on the roads front of a warning industrial establishment of the Korea Highway Corporation;

‘ is'.

However, the effect of Articles 86, 83(1)2 and 54(1) of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005), which is the applicable provisions of the facts charged, was retroactively lost pursuant to the Constitutional Court Order 2010Hun-Ga38 of Oct. 28, 2010 and the proviso of Article 47(2) of the Constitutional Court Act.

Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.