When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person driving a radar car.

피고인은 2013. 11. 16. 19:40경 서울 송파구 잠실3동 169 레이크 팰리스 아파트 앞 횡단보도에서 위 승용차를 운전하여 갤러리 삼거리 방면에서 놀이마당 삼거리 방면으로 편도 3차선 도로 중 2차로를 불상의 속도로 진행하게 되었다.

Since there is a crosswalk where a signal, etc. is installed, there was a duty of care to safely drive a motor vehicle in accordance with the new subparagraph after checking whether a person engaged in driving the motor vehicle has a duty of care to reduce speed and to see the front side well.

그럼에도 불구하고 피고인은 이를 게을리 한 채 차량정지신호에 그대로 진행한 과실로, 피고인의 진행방향 우측인 레이크 팰리스 아파트 단지에서 좌측인 롯데월드 방향으로 보행자 신호에 따라 횡단보도를 건너던 피해자 C(남, 6세)의 좌측 다리부분을 피고인 운전의 위 승용차의 우측 앞부분으로 들이받았다.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the mouth of the following bridge parts, which requires approximately six weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Each investigation report - Statements of witnesses

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Selection of a selective fine for punishment (including the fact that the defendant is against his depth, the fact that the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant, the first crime, and the fact that the victim has subscribed to a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance by making payment of three million won or more to the victim, etc.);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;