협박
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The Defendant was the victim B (here, 66 years of age) who was guilty of charges, and the victim thought that he/she arbitrarily disposed of and used the real estate under the name of the Defendant with the husband C, which was the husband of the Defendant, and there was no good appraisal on the victim.
1. On May 2018, the Defendant 23:30 on the French, Franchising the phone to the victim and threatened the victim with “a two-years, a two-years, and a two-years, as they are on that spot. Aknb with a knife, kniff will die. He or she will not have find and find with a knife in the U.S.).”
2. On November 2018, 2018, the Defendant: (a) 19:00 on the Franchisday, the Defendant threatened the victim, saying, “Is the victim with a fluencing of flusium, flusium, n. n. n. n. n. n. n. n. n. n. n. n. n. kn. n. n.
2. Determination
(a) Crimes of non-compliance with an intention (Article 283 (3) of the Criminal Act);
(b) Withdrawal of the victim's wish to punish after prosecution;
(c) Judgment dismissing public prosecution (Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act);