Defendant

If B does not pay the above fine, 100.

Defendant

A Co., Ltd. is a corporation that vicariously executes the sales business of E Co., Ltd., and Defendant B is a person who works as the head of the sales office.

1. The advertisements, as described in paragraph 2, are likely to undermine road traffic safety by Defendant A, the head of the sales headquarters of Defendant A Company, were installed to commit the act of violation.

2. No one may display or install an advertisement similar to a signal apparatus or road sign, etc. or in the form of impairing the usefulness thereof, or other advertisement, etc. which is likely to impair road traffic safety, while the defendant shall display or install the advertisement, etc. from around March 25, 2014 to the same year;

4. Until September 19, an advertisement board was installed at a place where advertisements, etc., such as white-do, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-dong, and traffic signal around both-dong, street trees, etc. should not be installed in an urban area, such as in the list of crimes in the annexed sheet.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on sales agency contracts to each on-site photographs, accusations against violators of the Outdoor Advertisements, etc. Control Act, illegal banner photographs (E), and sales agency contracts;

1. Articles 18 (1) 3, 5 (1) (Article 19 for Defendant A) of the Outdoor Advertisements, etc. Control Act (Article 18 (1) 3, 5 (1) of the same Act concerning criminal facts, and selection of fines for Defendant B;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B of detention in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, each of the provisional payment orders;