항만시설 사용허가취소 재결처분의 취소
1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Plaintiff, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. (1) On May 27, 2013, the Plaintiff deleted the ocean waste discharge business from its business objective on the register of corporate register, and added cleaning business on June 21, 2013. On June 5, 2013, the Plaintiff obtained approval for the closure of the ocean waste discharge business on June 5, 2014, after reporting the closure of the ocean waste discharge business to the Changwon Coast Guard, and the Plaintiff engaged in the ocean transportation business, and the Defendant’s auxiliary intervenor (hereinafter “participating”) runs the ocean transportation business and the aggregate sand wholesale business in trade name B.
3) Meanwhile, on January 8, 2015, the name was changed to the Administrator of the Masan Regional Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Office.
(B) The Minister of Oceans and Fisheries is delegated with the authority to grant permission, etc. for the use of harbor facilities by the Minister of Oceans and Fisheries pursuant to Article 92 of the Harbor Act and Article 91(1)17 of the Enforcement Decree of the Harbor Act.
on April 9, 2013, 2013, the Masan-si Masan-dong 67-1 Masan-dong, Changwon-si Masan-dong Masan-si (the Donsan-si where a small vessel is landing is mainly unloaded with a wharf where a small vessel is landing) shall be the Don-do.
hereinafter referred to as “instant port facilities”
(2) On April 10, 2013, the head of Mapo-gu Maritime Affairs and Port Office applied for a permit for exclusive use with respect to the Plaintiff, etc., and on April 10, 2013, the head of Mapo-gu Maritime Affairs and Port Office prescribed the purpose of use with respect to the 2,945 square meters (Plaintiff 1,445 square meters, 1,500 square meters for Daejin-jin Shipping) among the instant harbor facilities as the period from April 10, 2013 to December 31, 2013, the period of use for the exclusive use of harbor facilities (hereinafter
A. Before 200:
C. On May 1, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application with the head of the Msan Regional Maritime Port Office for permission to install the marine sand removal facilities related to the instant harbor facilities pursuant to Article 9(2) of the Harbor Act. However, the head of the Msan Regional Maritime Port Office on June 11, 2014.