물품대금
1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 104,343,050 and the interest rate of KRW 5% per annum from December 25, 2015 to the date of full payment.
1. The Plaintiff, who runs the PVC recycling business, etc., was supplied with “PVC so-called “B” in the trade name from March 3, 2014 to October 2, 2015, as indicated below, from the Defendant who runs the trade business, etc., to the Defendant, as indicated in the following table:
(2) The Plaintiff paid the total value of 2014-03-03-03 41, 810 650 27,176, 717, 650 294, 890 2014-09-025, 906, 7900 196, 600 196, 6960 2014-10-1009, 608, 60630, 608-12, 605, 608, 600, 60166, 600, 601, 250, 607, 605, 205, 207, 605, 205, 205, 207, 604, 605, 606, 25200, 7500, 750, 20105
(3) PVC (polyvil chloride, polyvinyl chloride) is used to manufacture water pipes, etc. as a intermediate of salted vinyl, and PVDC (polyvil chlorum, polyvinylvin Den) is used to manufacture synthetic fibres, films for food packaging, etc. as a intermediate of saltyl chloride.
[Ground of recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 4 through 10 (including paper numbers), Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 7, 9 (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The assertion and judgment
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion (i.e., the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant to be supplied with the “PVC dust,” which is a raw material for the PVC product, from March 3, 2014 to October 2, 2015, with the knowledge that the Defendant was supplied with the “PVC dust” (quality) from the Defendant, and that the goods supplied by the Defendant were not “PVC dust,” and that the fact that the goods supplied by the Defendant was “PVC dust,” not “PVC dust,” was known during the instant lawsuit.
The “PVC” and the Defendant, which the Plaintiff was supplied, actually supplied to the Plaintiff.