However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 10, 2016, the Defendant appeared as a witness in the case of violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (joint injury) against the Defendant No. 7410 of the above court at the Busan District Court No. 355 located in Busan District Court at around 14:0, the Busan District Court at around 15 Busan District Court at around 14:00, and tried to give notice of the right to refuse to testify.

Around 22:05 on July 31, 2015, the instant case was jointly conducted by B, C, and D, and around 22:05, from “G restaurant” at the entrance of the F market located in the Geum-gu Busan Metropolitan City, for the purpose of H and wage problems, B used the face of H to drink and walking side by sprinking it. C was sprinking the h’s breath, and D was sprinking the h’s breath, and C was spicking the h’s breath, etc. under the condition that H’s breath treatment is required for approximately four weeks in one time, and D used the h’s breathroth, and the Defendant used the h’s breath in relation to the instant case.

Nevertheless, the Defendant showed that the Defendant drinking the head of H and the head of Ha who want to drink and collect the frequency of alcoholic beverage around 22:00 :00 on the same day ( July 31, 2015) 22:00 :00,000 on the same day and 2:00 :00,000

testimony at the examination of “Isday” and “Isday in the frequency when I want to go from the (H) frequency at that time.”

“I have reported that “I have any dispute” in the newspaper “.”

The witness gives testimony as "the case" and the witness gives testimony as "the case" in the newspaper "I am unable to judge at all about Defendant B's time", and the witness "(the case in this case in question) has made a telephone call with the prosecutor.

It is well aware of "I" in the newspaper of "I".

The testimony was made and the testimony was made in the case of “The Examination of the Republic of Korea” in which the memory was known.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. A. A.