When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is referred to C as the owner of the land B in Busan-gun.

On January 2018, the Defendant: (a) removed the d. access road, which was used as access to the above site; (b) removed the d.e., block f., which was installed as the boundary of the above access road and the F site owned by the victim E; and (c) he stored a new block f.m. at a point at a size of 1m and 50m below the victim’s land ownership, thereby making it impossible to recognize the boundary of land.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to written petition, photographs before and after the removal of a wall, ledger of each land, and written confirmation for land use plan;

1. Relevant Article 370 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;