Of the facts charged of this case, the prosecution against assault is dismissed.

A. On April 1, 2014, around 21:30 on April 21, 201, the Defendant reported to the head of the guards' office in Songpa-gu Seoul apartment management office that “No security guard shall work at night” to the victim D (the age of 64) of the head of the guards’ office at night by walking the phone F, and reported to the victim G (the age of 60) of the guard site who is on night duty by telephone in the same manner at around 2:00 on the same day, that “the victim G (the age of 60) of the guards (the age of 320 40 Do 402) want not open a defective door to check and check the victim’s phone, and said, from around 23:05 to 23:45 of the same day, the Defendant used an apartment unit without walking the phone through the above method, thereby obstructing or repeatedly responding to the situation of emergency call by force.

In addition, from around that time to around July 30, 2014, the Defendant interfered with the duties of the security guards of the above apartment security team, such as victim D, G, and H, by deceptive means or force as shown in the attached list of crimes (1). From December 1, 2014 to June 3, 2015, the Defendant left the phone number of the above security team head office in Songpa-gu, Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 320 and 502, with the phone number from around June 3, 2015, the Defendant left the phone number of the above security team to the guard room, and “the security center is not in the guard room,” “the security center is not in the guard room,” “the security center is replaced with another person,” and “the head office from around 23:00 to 09:00,000 from the next day, the center and new walls do not leave the phone number with the above security team.