beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.07.21 2017고정438

특수폭행

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 22, 2016, at around 12:00, the Defendant: (a) committed an assault against the victim, including, but not limited to, the Defendant: (b) 102 Dong-dong 1012 and 1012, Jung-gu Daejeon, Daejeon; (c) and (d) G, a parent-child of F, while drinking alcohol to the Defendant’s parents; (d) sought E and F along with the victim H (39 years old), a neighboring resident; and (e) caused the assault against the Defendant, such as cutting down the 1012 b and cutting down the bpher, and cutting down the bphere of the victim, and cutting down the bphere of the Defendant, to the extent that it does not interfere with the Defendant’s exercise of his/her defense right. The facts charged are corrected based on evidence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the defendant (as at the date of the first public trial, in the case);

1. A protocol concerning the suspect B of the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning witness H and I's respective statutory statements;

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment

1. The summary of the facts charged was around 12:00, around October 22, 2016, the Defendants: (a) with F, the mother of F, while drinking F, together with F, which is the mother of F, the victim H (39 years of age) who is a neighboring resident; (b) discovered F, together with F, with the Defendant’s her mother-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-

As a result, the Defendants assaulted the victim by carrying dangerous objects jointly.

2. Defendants’ assertion

A. A. There is only a fact that the dispute between Defendant B and the Defendant A is satisfy, and there was no violence against H in collaboration with the Defendant A.

B. Although Defendant A’s instant act of cutting down the h’s breath and h’s h’s breath, it was true that Defendant A’s h’s act of force was boomed and h’s breath, as indicated in the facts charged in the instant case, it did not

3...