When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On May 12, 2018, the Defendant entered into a lease contract for the building D with C around May 12, 2018.

1. On August 27, 2018, the Defendant forged private documents at the F Certified Judicial Scriveners Office located in Seo-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon: B: G, address: H apartment I, telephone number: Seo-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon, and the terms and conditions to comply with the entry and the terms and conditions to comply with the K, L, and this behavior’s agreement with respect to the amount of KRW 2.80,000,000,000 to be paid to K, L, and this behavior’s agreement, and the details of the special agreement.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged one copy of the letter of performance, which is a private document on the rights and obligations of the name B.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, issued one copy of the performance letter prepared as above to K, who is aware of the forgery.

Accordingly, the defendant exercised a forged performance letter on the rights and obligations of the name B.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect of the defendant or C by the prosecution, or a protocol concerning the examination of the suspect of each police against C;

1. Each police statement made to B or K;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to file a complaint, a contract for the lease of commercial buildings, a certificate, a contract for repayment of debts, a contract for the lease of commercial buildings, and a contract for the lease of commercial buildings (including A writing);

1. Articles 231 and 234 of the Criminal Act and selection of fines concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act in the order of provisional payment is that the defendant has been sentenced two times to a suspended sentence of imprisonment due to the charge of forging a private document and committing a criminal investigation document. However, in this case, the defendant is under the condition that B who is the husband of the defendant is liable to pay a lease deposit to C.