However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Injury;

A. On June 21, 2017, at around 04:15, the Defendant: (a) sought to get a taxi that was driven by the Victim B (39) on the road located in Daegu Suwon-gu C; and (b) sought to get a taxi to and have arrived at the destination of the said taxi; (c) but (d) the Defendant sought to get a taxi to and depart from E with the said taxi.

Nevertheless, there was a defect that the defendant tried to force the above E, and the victim prevented it.

When the Defendant was unable to commit an act from the victimized person, the Defendant “(i) is impunched feas, (ii) feas, and (iii) is affiliated with it;

v. N. H. H. H.T.T.

“The victim expressed the Defendant to the police,” and the victim expressed the Defendant’s face to the Defendant, to the Defendant’s face, to the Defendant’s bath, to the Defendant’s face, to the Defendant’s bath, and to the Defendant’s face, to the Defendant’s hair, etc., once every time, and to the Defendant’s face to the Defendant, etc., the victim took approximately two weeks of treatment.

B. The Defendant was subject to the assault against the above B from the victim E (n, 30 years of age) at the time and place described in the above A. A. The Defendant suffered injury to the victim, i.e., brutum dump, etc., requiring approximately two weeks of treatment, on the floor of the knives of the female, three times the knives of the female, and the body was pushed off, thereby having the female go beyond the floor.

2. On June 21, 2017, at around 04:30 on June 21, 2017, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties from G to a police officer belonging to the Daegu Water Station F District of Police Station called up after receiving a report from B at the place described in the foregoing paragraph (1). The Defendant was subject to the control of his behavior from G, who was called up. The Defendant “in this case, she shall be subject to a tax base

“In doing so, assaulted, i.e., f., f., its title at one time, and f.e., f., her chest with her body.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the handling of reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol related to B, E, and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 257(1) and 136(1) (a) of the Criminal Act, and Articles 136(1) (a) (a point of obstructing the performance of official duties) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code, and Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Code.