A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 2,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

1. Defendants A, a public invitation of the Defendants, is the representative of 107 apartment buildings in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and Defendant B, a resident of 105 apartment buildings in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Defendants were elected by the victim E (78 years old) elected as the representative of the occupants of the above apartment on August 6, 2014 by an illegal election.

During the argument, the victim would hold a representative meeting of occupants on April 23, 2015.

The defect in the public announcement, the suspicion of illegal election at the above meeting, and the intention to interfere with the progress of the meeting of the injured party.

Accordingly, on April 23, 2015, the Defendants arrive in the office of the representative meeting of the occupants of the above apartment building on April 23, 2015, and Defendant B sit in the seat of the chairperson and speaks that Defendant A will sit in the seat of the chairperson.

At the next meeting of the president, the statement of intention kept at the seat of the president is concealed below the table, and the defendant A was seated at the seat of the president.

Defendant A continued to refuse a request by the victim to turn off the place for the proceedings of the meeting, while refusing the request.

I do not hold a meeting if I do not know of this agenda.

Defendant B, “Isk for the aged and al.e. of the victim”, and Defendant B, “Isk for the chairman of Marson

“Armony” has reached a sound.

The Defendants conspired as such and interfered with the progress of the victim's representative meeting for about 45 minutes by force.

2. On July 24, 2015, Defendant A attended a meeting of occupants representatives held at the same place as on July 24, 2015, and the victim who intends to proceed with the meeting shall move in by the Chairperson of Maison Maison Mabpp, who is not qualified as the chairperson.

“Around one-time period of time,” she interfered with the progress of the meeting of occupants of the victim by force, such as cutting down the meeting of the victim with sound, cutting down the meeting of the president, and cutting down the meeting of the consignee.

Summary of Evidence

1. Any statement concerning the Defendants in part of each protocol of interrogation of the police officer

1. The witness E’s legal statement (as to the crime of No. 1 of the judgment, Defendant B’s statement and the seat are trusted.