When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On April 11, 2016, the Defendant: (a) stolen the cash receipts and disbursements amounting to KRW 365,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A H statement;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs by cutting CCTV in 365 Corners at the original station of the Korean bank;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Selection of a selective fine for punishment (the Defendant had several past history of larceny crimes, and committed the instant crime repeatedly even though he/she had the same record of the sentence and the suspension of execution, even though he/she had committed the instant crime. Therefore, the Defendant needs to punish him/her for the punishment corresponding to his/her responsibility.

In doing so, various circumstances shown in the records and changes, that is, this case, unlike the existing larceny case, has taken into account the fact that it was seriously stolen by reporting the neglected cash in contrast to the previous larceny case, and some of the circumstances are taken into account, that the damaged goods are small, the damaged goods are returned to the victim, and that the victim’s mistake is divided and reflected, etc., a fine shall be selected only once in consideration of the favorable circumstances.

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;