However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 17:40 on December 25, 2014, the Defendant: (a) laid off the 'E' of the victim D operation in Yangju-si; (b) 1 punishment of the above clothes owned by the victim by the Defendant by inserting the 660,000 won of the Kacro clore Sclouses displayed in the above store using the cresh in which the F of the store employees are engaged in any other business at the above storer; and (c) putting the 1 punishment of the above clothes owned by the victim in the Defendant’s store.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A statement prepared in F;

1. On-site photographs and investigation reports (on-siteCCTV verification);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to records of seizure, lists of seizure and reports on investigation (emergency photographs of seized articles);

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 329 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act provides that a person has a career of having been punished on several occasions, such as a single sentence for the same crime, two times the suspension of execution, etc.);

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;